This has been one of my many challenges for the Gangadeanians. How do they know what knowledge is? In particular, how do they know that knowledge requires clarity/certainty? Is it by way of a sound argument? Is it self-attesting or self-evident? Does their theory of knowledge need to be presupposed in order to question anything? Hardly...(hint, it's Gangadean's intuition).
No comments:
Post a Comment